• Kokesh@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Maybe they know something we don’t know? What if: It will be a crime series following the “Fall guy” case, man who was a Boeing whistleblower and got sucked out of the fuselage mid flight. Was it the usual door falling off, or was it a murder? Maybe it is being filmed right now and Google leaked the information?

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    We really need a whole community just for the very funny AI errors like this. I could spend all day reading about leaving a dog in a hot car, jumping off a bridge and eating at least one rock a day.

        • Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Great content isn’t necessarily everyone’s prefered content. Having it all in one place helps people who want to see it see it and people who don’t don’t have to. Win win.

  • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Google has been bad for a long time, but they’ve shut the bed so hard lately. Seriously, look at this:

    I actually run out of screenshot space before I can get to an actual regular search result!

  • weew@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Well, we know Google won’t get rid of this.

    They’ll only cancel it after it actually works and becomes useful

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    What the hell is going on with Google search? Has it completely shit itself after the AI implementation? I know its been bad for a while but this is another level.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Short answer, yes. The ratio of LLM generated noise to actual content is increasing exponentially as we speak. To us it seems overnight because the increase is so steep but it’s been happening for several years. And it’s going to get a lot worse.

      Honestly, I think we’ll have to go back to 90s methods like web rings and human curated link directories.

      • PenisWenisGenius@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I do random hobby tinkering and search results have become so useless that I’m having to read a lot more books. Everything takes longer this way.

  • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I stopped using Google years ago. I started using Bing but had to stop that as it would divert me to MSN to sign in when clicking a link for a news article. Like a news article for The Independent or The Times or any other.

    I then started using DuckDuckGo which is powered by Bing, but found it wasn’t great at many searches.

    I now use Arc Search most of the time and click browse for me to get the information I want without the bullshit. Search is essentially dead due to greed.

    • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      But the real question is, is the colour blue that you see, the colour blue that I see?

    • voracitude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      On the one hand, generative AI doesn’t have to give deterministic answers i.e. it won’t necessarily generate the same answer even when asked the same question in the same way.

      But on the other hand, editing the HTML of any page to say whatever you want and then taking a screenshot of it is very easy.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        It could also be A/B testing, so not everyone will have the AI running in general

          • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Google runs passive A/B testing all the time.

            If you’re using a Google service there’s a 99% chance you’re part of some sort of internal test of changes.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I spent most of today looking at places to rent in Denver and I come home to Google having killed it’s fucking search engine. What the hell is going on

    • DragonOracleIX@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Google decided that the entirety of reddit is perfect for training data in their AI LLM. People’s shitposts from 10 years ago have now been given the spotlight at the top of google searches.

    • ArcticAmphibian@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Nope. Google trained the model it’s using for search results off of Reddit, etc. junk data and expected it to be coherent.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I wonder if they considered reddit votes to try to give more weight to high quality answers but also high quality jokes.

        But without votes pure nonsense becomes equal to truth.

        Humans could use reddit because we understand the site enough to be able to filter the valuable from the bad.

        I feel like the answer would be in between ai specifically to be such a filter.

        Every such post of google failing i have screen capped and then asked chatgpt for a more detailed explanation to do what google suggests i do. Everytime it managed to call out the issues. So just allowing an ai to proofread its response in context of the question could stop a lot of hallucinations.

        But its at least 3 times as slow and expensive if it needs to change its first response.

        But i guess doing things properly isnt profitable , better to just rush tech and kill your most famous product.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          People upvote stupid stuff as well though. Because humans understand humor, irony, and satire.

          The AI is like those people that need /s to be able to work it out. If it’s missing they erroneously take everything as serious.

          • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Everyone who wants more of that, stop adding “/s” to your posts.

            Even better, start using /s for serious instead

            • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Speaking as an autist for the entire autistic community.

              PLEASE DONT

              What have i set in motion :o