Edit: I guess this post is free advertising for these shitters, so I will describe what I previously linked.

There is this TV you can get for free but it has a ads on screen constantly and it has a camera pointed at you to record your reactions to ads and to ensure you don’t cover up the ad portion of the screen.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Exactly, what’s the use of a smart TV when I have a game console capable of streaming everything a “Smart TV” can AND playing games/browsing the Web?
      9/10 times people use a fire stick or cable box to watch TV anyway, all I need is volume, input selection, and power.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        7 months ago

        You need that “smart” stuff to make smaller resolutions look good on a 4k TV.

        Upscaling takes processing power, so adding in the smart functions doesn’t really need anything else.

        Without the upscaling, it’s often a waste to buy a 4k TV because very few sources are in 4k. You’d be getting the same picture quality as 1080

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            7 months ago

            What does wifi have to do with anything?

            And if it upscaled well, it’s already got the processing power to have all the apps installed. So, cool it doesn’t have that, but it’s kind of a waste you don’t… And seems a lot more likely you’re overestimating it.

            But I have a feeling if you look up your TV on rtings you’ll be surprised, or find out you bought a weird Black Friday model that’s been feature stripped to be as cheap and low quality as possible while marking a couple highlights to advertise on the box.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                7 months ago

                I think people don’t understand that the processing abilities upscaling needs means adding smart functionality is basically free.

                That’s why I mentioned looking up the model number, I’m confident what that person said their TV was isn’t what it is.

                No “dumb” TV is going to be good at upscaling because of that. OP might think it is, but they’re probably mistaken about something

                • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Smart TV defines the extra functionality, not the processing hardware. If a smart TV has the Wi-Fi and streaming services disabled it is by definition NOT a smart TV.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          you dont need to shove “smart” features into them to habe upscaling

          any dumb computer monitor has it

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            any dumb computer monitor has it

            ?

            I googled, and found one high-end monitor with any kind of native upscaling…

            And saying something that is on the most expensive monitors has to be on the cheapest TVs doesn’t make a lot of sense…

            And that’s not even getting into what kind of upscaling or how a bigger screen size makes upscaling more important.

            Like a 22 inch it doesn’t matter, but an 80 it’s really important

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Isn’t it time to stop being polite and start relentlessly mocking anyone who voluntarily buys this shit?

  • Endmaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I wouldn’t have known about it if not for this post.

    Now this post feels like an ad.

  • vrek@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    There were several isps that did this years ago… A banner at bottom is of your screen showing ads, free internet. They all went bankrupt I think.

  • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s “free” which means you’re paying for it a different way than money. If you don’t want the ads then don’t get the “free” TV.

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Yeah. I’m completely behind the complaints people have with a lot of modern world problems in this regard.

      • Ads on TVs you paid for
      • Ads on streaming services you paid for
      • Actually, ads on cable/satellite TV with a subscription in general. What a ridiculous concept of paying twice!
      • Subscriptions for hardware features already installed (although I am fine with a one-off payment to activate them. I can see the argument for a single SKU with all features installed and deactivated for making the production line simpler)

      But in this case, they’re very clear. They are making hardware available at no monetary cost. Therefore, you MUST know they’re monetizing you somehow, and this is the somehow.

      Having said that, yes, the description does seem like the dystopian tellyscreens in nineteen-eighty-four. But they were mandatory for everyone, which is the main difference.

      • aleph@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Having said that, yes, the description does seem like the dystopian tellyscreens in nineteen-eighty-four. But they were mandatory for everyone, which is the main difference.

        This is actually closer to Brave New World than Nineteen Eighty-Four. In the former, citizens voluntarily buy huge TVs to adorn their living room walls because their whole society is built around pleasure-seeking and entertainment. These displays are then used by the powers that be to distract and pacify the population, prevent critical thinking and reduce political unrest.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Actually looking through the site. I don’t really see how they’re going to make enough money on this.

        I cannot see anywhere on their site that suggests the camera will be watching you (and there’s probably laws against that, even in the USA!) and the FAQ specifically says the camera has a cover and only an app using the camera will make that open, and you have to accept the permission.

        Also, it seems they play the ads on a separate screen. Which suggests there won’t be sound either. So they don’t even expect you to be paying attention to the ads, because it seems they won’t block content for them.

        I expect there might be an initial interest in advertisers. But if they don’t see a decent conversion rate, I cannot imagine they will keep paying enough to cover the TV for ads.

        Also, what happens when one of these breaks, they replace it for free? I’d imagine they would need to because otherwise the hardware they paid for is no longer generating revenue.

        This sounds like a late April fool. :P