• ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yeah gotta love the American approach.

    Have a problem?

    Don’t talk about it! 🤫 Hide it! Pretend it doesn’t exist! Shoot it, arrest it, prosecute it, imprison it. Make a profit from it! Blame political party for it!

    Wonder why the problem never goes away 🤔 fashion elaborate conspiracy theories. Complain about it!

    Repeat.

    American society and governance is thoroughly dysfunctional and that’s why it’s a failure.

  • shimdidly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Isaiah 3

    14 The Lord will enter into judgment with the ancients of his people, and the princes thereof: for ye have eaten up the vineyard; the spoil of the poor is in your houses.

    15 What mean ye that ye beat my people to pieces, and grind the faces of the poor? saith the Lord God of hosts.

    • eggmasterflex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Also Deuteronomy 15:

      7 If there is among you anyone in need, a member of your community in any of your towns within the land that the Lord your God is giving you, do not be hard-hearted or tight-fisted toward your needy neighbor.

      8 You should rather open your hand, willingly lending enough to meet the need, whatever it may be.

      9 Be careful that you do not entertain a mean thought, thinking, “The seventh year, the year of remission, is near,” and therefore view your needy neighbor with hostility and give nothing; your neighbor might cry to the Lord against you, and you would incur guilt.

      10 Give liberally and be ungrudging when you do so, for on this account the Lord your God will bless you in all your work and in all that you undertake.

      11 Since there will never cease to be some in need on the earth, I therefore command you, “Open your hand to the poor and needy neighbor in your land.”

      • Chr0nos1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        If you’re going to follow the Bible, make sure you’re not picking and choosing the parts you want to follow. If the commands from your god are that important, you can’t ignore half of them.

        2 Kings 6:28-29 But then the king asked, “What is the matter?” She replied, “This woman said to me: ‘Come on, let’s eat your son today, then we will eat my son tomorrow.’ So we cooked my son and ate him. Then the next day I said to her, ‘Kill your son so we can eat him,’ but she has hidden her son.

        Psalm 137:9 Blessed the one who seizes your children and smashes them against the rock: the children represent the future generations, and so must be destroyed if the enemy is truly to be eradicated

        Leviticus 25:44-46 “Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.”

        1 Timothy 2:11-12
        “A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet.”

        • Sophocles@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Your quotations seem to be heavily paraphrased, and are really taken out of context from the original stories. These are also not commandments, but rather things that happened in history and were a part of the culture at the time, thus there isn’t really any moral law to “follow” in these verses in the first place.

          Not really looking to argue, just adding context.

  • Crampon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Different take on the bench. The dividers allows for the pregnant and the disabled to sit. Which I believe is more important than letting some homeless sleep on that particular bench.

    • Zacryon@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      You can have those arm handles at the ends of benches without being dividers, accommodating both, people with movement problems and homeless people who need a spot to sleep.

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        No they’re point was if there is someone sleeping on the bench there isn’t space for someone to sit who needs to sit

        • Zacryon@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Most people sleep at night. Pregnant and people with movement impairments are usually not met at night.

          • aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            People are not the norm though, there are plenty of situations where there is conflict like at transit hubs like bus stops and train stations

            • Zacryon@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              You are absolutley right. Wouldn’t it be a great idea then to build more benches or fight causes for homelessness in general instead of shooing some away from some benches?

      • Crampon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        So you’re supposed to sit on the homeless person as if they were some piece of cloth?

        Ok.

        • Zacryon@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s not what I said. But you do you. If you feel better that way, go for it. Idk if that’s legal though. Maybe ask nicely beforehand. :)

        • gallopingsnail@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Because as we all know, without dividers every bench in the city would have a homeless person sleeping on it 24 hours a day non-stop, never allowing anyone to sit down ever again.

          • Crampon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            No they won’t. They will only sleep there the exact moment someone with a disability isn’t nearby. They can sense people in need. So they wake up and leave the premises. Right?

            This comment section is literally insane.

            • colon_capital_D@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Damn, you hate homeless people so much, you’re using pregnancy and disabled people as an excuse. Just say you don’t like homeless people, it’s easier

              • Crampon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Incredible cognitive decay. Case study right here. Weaponized degenerative genes.

                I actually believe in housing the homeless. And making sure infrastructure is available with bare minimum annoyance to the average person.

                I live in a country often praised by leftist ideologist in the US. You eat posts like this as cocaine glazed meth.

                You are not able to carry two thoughts at the same time. Pure fuel for the conservatists in your country.

                • gallopingsnail@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Dawg, slow down for a minute.

                  In your first comment, you say the extra armrests are there to keep “some homeless” (not even a homeless PERSON) off the bench for disabled individuals. You’re saying that benches should have these installed because seating disabled people is more important than letting “some homeless” use it for a night’s rest.

                  When others point out that a bench with armrests at the ends and no dividers could be used by both groups, you say “bUt YoU hAvE tO SiT oN tHe hOmELeSs” as if 2 people can’t use a bench at the same time. It’s a bench, not a chair, that’s the whole point. What are you even arguing here, that if homeless people are allowed to use benches that they’ll all be occupied, and they all will refuse to move, and we’ll have to sit on the unhoused? Absolutely preposterous.

                  And then, when all this is pointed out to you, you say the rest of us have “degenerative” genes and can’t hold 2 thoughts at the same time. Really? That’s straight up far right rhetoric, bringing up the inferior genes shit.

                  Yes, unhoused people should absolutely have a place to go, but we don’t need to build our cities to be hostile towards them.

                  TLDR: Go the fuck outside, get some help, go for a walk, call your mom, hell, even go talk to a homeless person, touch grass. I’m done with Lemmy for today, you should be too.